Proposed RPP SUSPENSION TEACHER because it contains DISCRIMINATION ON PRIVATE TEACHERS and the other NON-civil servants teachers. Please download here surat untuk Presiden, pers release FGII,
usulan subsidi UMP dan jamsostek
Discrimination in the work of the constitutional clearly not justified. Article 28D (2) the 1945 Constitution states that: "Everyone has the right to work and get the benefits of treatment and a fair and reasonable in the working relationship." Law No. 14 of 2005 on Teachers and Lecturers Article 14, paragraph (1) also stated that: "Every teacher has the right to earn money above the minimum needs of life insurance and social welfare."
The spirit of the formation of the Law No. 14 of 2005 on Teachers and Lecturers and RPP Teachers is remove discrimination among workers and teachers aimed at improving the welfare, quality and protection to teachers. The reality in the legislation is still visible things that can discriminate non-PNS/private teachers and teachers to increase their welfare, quality and teacher rights protection. The fact is visible in several ways:
1. If the article 17 of Law Teachers and Lecturers civil servants, teachers automatically get the functional benefits of teachers only to private subsidies functional allowance, the allowance for the profession given by the government without a difference;
2. Teachers civil servants, according to article 15 get automatic salary based on the laws and regulations applicable to temporary teachers be paid based on private agreement or agreements with (PKB / KKB), which will impact on the weak protection of private teachers because there is no umbrella law (Law), which underlies the rules, including the PKB is not set in the RPP Teachers. Without the certainty that the PKB / KKB will not realize the principles of equality and collegiallity in the preparation of the PKB / KKB;
3. Rules on the ratio of students to teachers who made the requirements for obtaining benefits profession in the article 17 RPP Teachers will any teachers who have passed the certification to obtain professional allowance requires the ratio of students to teachers is not rational and not realistic;
4. Rules on functional requirements allowances in the article 19 RPP Teachers not only will any teachers to obtain the functional benefits but will also eliminate rights for the functional benefits received by the teachers in the department because the requirements are too "illusory". The rights of the allowance is the right functional operation inherent in the salaries that can be accepted without conditions;
5. Rules about the requirements to obtain maslahat particularly in obtaining additional education facilities for the son and daughter of teachers, health service or other form of welfare, as given in Article 24, paragraph (6) is not rational and realistic are not even human. For example, if a teacher must first meet the burden of work or have a certificate of educators to obtain health services?
To remove all forms of discrimination in laws and regulations related to teachers and to restore the spirit of the early establishment of the Teachers Law, which aims to improve the welfare, protection and quality of the teachers should take, how many things:
1. In order to run the government obligation to provide protection for teachers' action against discrimination and unfair treatment, as mandated by Article 39 of Law Teachers, the government must eliminate all forms of conditions that can lead to action and unfair discrimination against teachers. Carelessness against the rules that lead to discrimination and unfair treatment of teachers can be a violation of Article 39 of Law Teachers can apply sanctions, as reiterated in Article 79 of Law Teachers, which states that: Paragraph (1) The education or the education unit of violation against provisions referred to in Article 24, Article 34, Article 39, Article 63 paragraph (4), Article 71 and Article 75 were given sanctions in accordance with the laws and regulations. Paragraph (2) Sanctions for education form: reprimand, written warning, restriction of the activities of the education unit, or freezing the activities of the education unit.
Article 1 point 5 states that: "The education is the government, local governments or community education on the point of formal education." This means that the government, local government and community education providers can apply sanctions if the action discriminatory and unfair to teachers.
2. Ratification of the RPP Teachers should be delayed until there is certainty of the following:
a. That the allowance is given as the functional benefits inherent in the salary without additional conditions;
b. "Maslahat" additional allowances that are associated with health services must be provided without the requirement to all teachers;
c. Control about the ratio of students to teachers should be reviewed and re-created in a rational and realistic;
d. There should be about the PKB / KKB to private teachers who provide protection, equality and kesejawatan teachers to the private / non-civil servants and teachers' organizations participation in the determination of the PKB / KKB it;
e. There must be rules that ensure the provision of salary allowances of UMP and Jamsostek) for frivate teachers / non-civil servants.
Jakarta, December 4, 2008
Executive Staffs CENTER BOARD
Indonesian Independent Teachers Federation
Chairman General, the Secretary-General
Suparman Iwan Hermawan
Indonesian Independent Teachers Federation
COMPONENTS:
1. NAD-Teacher Associations (Asgunad)
2. -Coalition Barisan Teachers Barsatu (Kobar-GB-NAD)
3. Community Water-Eye Teachers, North Sumatra (KAMG)
4. Teachers Andalas States-North Sumatara (Segara)
5. Independent Teachers' Forum, West Sumatra (FGI Sumatera)
6. -Teachers Forum dignity Indonesia-Lampung (FMGI)
7. Independent Teachers' Forum-Riau Islands (FGI concern)
8. -Teachers Communication Forum Tangerang Banten (FKGT)
9. -Teachers Unions Jakarta (SGJ)
10. -Independent Teachers Forum aspire West Java (FAGI)
11. Forum-Teacher Teacher-Hangu (FOGGAR)
12. Teachers Unions-Hikmah Teladan Erode (SAHATE)
13. Energy-Forum honorary Private School, West Java (Jabar FTHSS)
14. -Teachers Association of Private Employees, Central Java, Indonesia (PGKSI)
15. -School Teachers and Employees of Private School Indonesia DIY (PEGKSSI)
16. -Teachers Association-Private School Officers Indonesia DIY (IGPSSI)
17. -Communication Forum Leicester City Teachers (Teachers Focus)
18. Teachers, the National Alliance of East Java, Indonesia (Agni)
19. -Teachers Association No Fixed East Java, Indonesia (PGTTI)
20. -Teachers Association of Indonesia Mahardika NTB (PGMI)
21. -Communication Forum for the Assessment Teachers aspire South Sulawesi, Indonesia (FK MORNING)
22. North-South Education Forum (SeDFOR)
23. Private-Teacher Association of East Kalimantan (pgs)
24. -Teachers Association for the Education Reform West Kalimantan (movement)
25. Independent Teachers' Forum, East Nusa Tenggara (NTT-FGI)
26. Independent Teachers' Forum-West Sumbawa (FGISB)
Executive Staffs REGIONAL COUNCIL:
DPD FGII Province of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam
DPD FGII West Sumatra Province
DPD FGII North Sumatra Province
DPD FGII Lampung
DPD FGII Riau Islands Province
DPD FGII Banten
DPD FGII Jakarta
DPD FGII West Java Province
DPD FGII Central Java Province
DPD FGII Yogyakarta Province
DPF FGII East Java Province
DPD FGII South Sulawesi Province
DPD FGII North Sulawesi Province
DPD FGII Province of East Kalimantan
DPD FGII West Kalimantan Province
Legality:
1. SKT Organization Massa Tax Professionals: 106/D.III.3/XII/2007
The Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia
2. Recording of evidence Unions FGII Tax: 450/I/XI/2007
Manpower and Transmigration Office Municipal Central Jakarta
Read More..
Showing posts with label Teacher Right Advocacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Teacher Right Advocacy. Show all posts
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Invitation
Pers Conference DPP FGII At Wisma Kodel 11th floor HR Rasuna Said Street Kav B4 South Jakarta Today, Thursday, 4 December 2008 at 2 pm the Federation of Indonesian Independent Teachers delivered a letter to Indonesian President to delay ratification until the RPP Teachers articles that discriminatory against private teacher removed. For the parties concerned with the improvement good work condition from teachers Indonesian civil servants and private can provide support in the form of a letter sent petition to PO BOX President. DPP FGII also receive donations for the improvement of working conditions of teachers and private non-civil servants other. Teacher solidarity for improving education
Read More..
Read More..
Label: foto, video
Teacher Right Advocacy
Thursday, November 20, 2008
Teacher soidarity for improving Education
Advocacy of Guru Bantu DPP FGII assist Guru Bantu Jakarta, which joined the Teachers' Forum Reform (first FKGBI) to consult LBH Jakarta. We received the Robert S. and Hermawanto from LBH Jakarta. The meeting began with the introduction and self Mrs. Evi FGR chairman explained that the chronological advocacy Guru Bantu, especially for 6 thousand Guru Bantu Jakarta. Agreed to surgical cases and prepare the agenda of the joint on Monday, 24 December 2008 at the LBH Jakarta
Read More..
Read More..
Label: foto, video
Teacher Right Advocacy
Discussion of Education on Nov 20
Statement of Vice President Jusuf Kalla
who ask teachers in the whole country does not split sides and still be expected under the shelter organization PGRI statement Chairman and General PB PGRI Sulistyo
that teachers should be allowed to punish students throughout does not exceed the limit and not dangerous shows the low socialization and the Law on Teachers Lecturers and the Child Protection Act. To this, DPP FGII hold discussions of Education, "Teachers: Labor or Professional Worker in Children's Rights Protection perspective" on:
Day / Date: Thursday, 20 November 2008
Hrs: 15:00 - 17:00 WIB
Venue: LBH Jakarta
Jl. Diponegoro No.. 74 Central Jakarta near the RSCM Welfare teacher contract valued private worse than the welfare of workers. The burden is still by a series of discrimination from the government.Kompas
Read More..
who ask teachers in the whole country does not split sides and still be expected under the shelter organization PGRI statement Chairman and General PB PGRI Sulistyo
that teachers should be allowed to punish students throughout does not exceed the limit and not dangerous shows the low socialization and the Law on Teachers Lecturers and the Child Protection Act. To this, DPP FGII hold discussions of Education, "Teachers: Labor or Professional Worker in Children's Rights Protection perspective" on:
Day / Date: Thursday, 20 November 2008
Hrs: 15:00 - 17:00 WIB
Venue: LBH Jakarta
Jl. Diponegoro No.. 74 Central Jakarta near the RSCM Welfare teacher contract valued private worse than the welfare of workers. The burden is still by a series of discrimination from the government.Kompas
Read More..
Label: foto, video
Teacher Right Advocacy
Thursday, November 6, 2008
How about teacher's welfare? Read More
According to Bambang, regents and mayors responsible for the increase in the education budget, 20 percent of the national budget allocated to the regions to pay for basic education and teacher's welfare. "Then there is political risk, there may be political opponents of impeachment, if not appropriate funds for education policy," said Bambang.Dana BOS Naik 50 Persen
SD-SMP Negeri Harus Gratis
Kamis, 6 November 2008 | 00:37 WIB
Jakarta, Kompas - Departemen Pendidikan Nasional menaikkan anggaran bantuan operasional sekolah atau BOS untuk jenjang SD dan SMP pada 2009 sekitar 50 persen dari tahun lalu. Dengan naiknya BOS, pemerintah meminta tidak boleh ada lagi pungutan kepada siswa, terutama di sekolah negeri.
”Dana BOS dan gaji guru sudah dinaikkan pemerintah pusat. Maka, wajib belajar di SD dan SMP negeri gratis. Tidak boleh ada pungutan paksa kepada siswa,” kata Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Bambang Sudibyo dalam rapat teknis bidang pendidikan Asosiasi Pemerintah Kabupaten Seluruh Indonesia (Apkasi) yang dihadiri para bupati dan kepala dinas pendidikan se-Indonesia di Jakarta, Rabu (5/11).
Dana BOS untuk setiap siswa pada 2009 nanti disatukan dengan BOS Buku dan besarnya berbeda antara di kota dan kabupaten. BOS untuk siswa SD per tahun di kabupaten besarnya Rp 397.000, sedangkan di kota Rp 400.000. Besarnya alokasi BOS sebelumnya Rp 254.000 dan BOS Buku Rp 22.000.
Adapun siswa SMP di kota mendapat dana BOS sebesar Rp 575.000 per siswa per tahun, sedangkan di kabupaten Rp 570.000 per tahun. Dana BOS di SMP sebelumnya Rp 354.000.
Dana daerah
Pemerintah provinsi dan kota/kabupaten, kata Bambang, wajib menyediakan dana untuk memenuhi kekurangan BOS. Masyarakat tetap diperbolehkan memberikan sumbangan ke sekolah untuk mendukung peningkatan kualitas pendidikan, tetapi tidak boleh dipaksa.
Menurut Bambang, bupati dan wali kota bertanggung jawab untuk menggunakan kenaikan anggaran pendidikan 20 persen dari APBN yang dialokasikan ke daerah untuk membiayai pendidikan dasar serta kesejahteraan guru. ”Nanti ada risiko politik, bisa saja ada impeachment dari lawan politik jika dana pendidikan tidak sesuai aturan,” ujar Bambang.
Adapun untuk program bantuan operasional manajemen mutu (BOMM) tingkat SMA yang dulu dihitung per sekolah, sekarang dihitung per siswa seperti BOS. Untuk SMA besarnya Rp 90.000 per siswa tiap tahun. Siswa SMK mendapat Rp 120.000.
MP Tumanggor, Ketua Umum Apkasi, mengatakan, komitmen pemerintah kabupaten untuk mengalokasikan dana pendidikan 20 persen dari APBD terkendala terbatasnya anggaran. Jika komponen gaji guru dimasukkan dalam anggaran pendidikan, pada 2009 semakin banyak kabupaten yang mampu memenuhi amanat konstitusi untuk mengalokasikan 20 persen anggaran pendidikan dari APBD. (ELN)
Read More..
SD-SMP Negeri Harus Gratis
Kamis, 6 November 2008 | 00:37 WIB
Jakarta, Kompas - Departemen Pendidikan Nasional menaikkan anggaran bantuan operasional sekolah atau BOS untuk jenjang SD dan SMP pada 2009 sekitar 50 persen dari tahun lalu. Dengan naiknya BOS, pemerintah meminta tidak boleh ada lagi pungutan kepada siswa, terutama di sekolah negeri.
”Dana BOS dan gaji guru sudah dinaikkan pemerintah pusat. Maka, wajib belajar di SD dan SMP negeri gratis. Tidak boleh ada pungutan paksa kepada siswa,” kata Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Bambang Sudibyo dalam rapat teknis bidang pendidikan Asosiasi Pemerintah Kabupaten Seluruh Indonesia (Apkasi) yang dihadiri para bupati dan kepala dinas pendidikan se-Indonesia di Jakarta, Rabu (5/11).
Dana BOS untuk setiap siswa pada 2009 nanti disatukan dengan BOS Buku dan besarnya berbeda antara di kota dan kabupaten. BOS untuk siswa SD per tahun di kabupaten besarnya Rp 397.000, sedangkan di kota Rp 400.000. Besarnya alokasi BOS sebelumnya Rp 254.000 dan BOS Buku Rp 22.000.
Adapun siswa SMP di kota mendapat dana BOS sebesar Rp 575.000 per siswa per tahun, sedangkan di kabupaten Rp 570.000 per tahun. Dana BOS di SMP sebelumnya Rp 354.000.
Dana daerah
Pemerintah provinsi dan kota/kabupaten, kata Bambang, wajib menyediakan dana untuk memenuhi kekurangan BOS. Masyarakat tetap diperbolehkan memberikan sumbangan ke sekolah untuk mendukung peningkatan kualitas pendidikan, tetapi tidak boleh dipaksa.
Menurut Bambang, bupati dan wali kota bertanggung jawab untuk menggunakan kenaikan anggaran pendidikan 20 persen dari APBN yang dialokasikan ke daerah untuk membiayai pendidikan dasar serta kesejahteraan guru. ”Nanti ada risiko politik, bisa saja ada impeachment dari lawan politik jika dana pendidikan tidak sesuai aturan,” ujar Bambang.
Adapun untuk program bantuan operasional manajemen mutu (BOMM) tingkat SMA yang dulu dihitung per sekolah, sekarang dihitung per siswa seperti BOS. Untuk SMA besarnya Rp 90.000 per siswa tiap tahun. Siswa SMK mendapat Rp 120.000.
MP Tumanggor, Ketua Umum Apkasi, mengatakan, komitmen pemerintah kabupaten untuk mengalokasikan dana pendidikan 20 persen dari APBD terkendala terbatasnya anggaran. Jika komponen gaji guru dimasukkan dalam anggaran pendidikan, pada 2009 semakin banyak kabupaten yang mampu memenuhi amanat konstitusi untuk mengalokasikan 20 persen anggaran pendidikan dari APBD. (ELN)
Read More..
Label: foto, video
Teacher Right Advocacy
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Government Must Create Standard Welfare for Teacher
MEDAN - MI: The government should create standards of welfare of teachers, as one of the efforts to improve the quality of education in Indonesia, said the Rector of the State University of Medan (Unimed) Shawwal Gultom.
"It would be difficult to improve the quality of education if teachers are not prosperous. Not only equity and expanding access to learning that needs to be improved, but the welfare of teachers is also an important factor in education reform," he said in Medan on Wednesday (29/10). Read More in Media Indonesia Read More..
"It would be difficult to improve the quality of education if teachers are not prosperous. Not only equity and expanding access to learning that needs to be improved, but the welfare of teachers is also an important factor in education reform," he said in Medan on Wednesday (29/10). Read More in Media Indonesia Read More..
Label: foto, video
Teacher Right Advocacy
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
FGII 's reccommendation
Teacher Solidarity for the improvement of education
Discrimination and poor working conditions obtained by a private teacher and honorary / Non-civil servants can be seen from the fact below:
1. Still many teachers are honorarium and the private sector has a salary under the UMP / UMK (Minimum Wages State / district / city);
2. No guarantee of social workers (Jamsostek), which can provide protection, health and safety insurance and old age;
3. There is still a system of contracts and the weak position of teachers in the set or agreements working with the teachers' vulnerable to lay;
4. The existence of discrimination laws Teachers of private teacher and honorary related to salaries, Jamsostek, the functional benefits, improving quality and qualified teachers;
5. The amount of the burden of the working face-to-face per hour (minimum 24-hour face-to-face) that can impact on the low level of the best service for students, the physical and psychological health of teachers working routines since fallen, poor concentration because teachers work more than one school.
(Article 89 and 90 Recommendation Status of Teachers UNESCO-willed ILO to the determination of hours of work teachers should consider the ideal number of students, the time available for teachers to plan and prepare for learning, including adequate time to conduct the assessment, teachers time to participate in the research, I activities and extra-curricular duties of supervision, counseling and guidance to students / students and parents dealing with students / pupils).
6. Still weak protection given to the teachers as mandated by Law Teachers Article 39 is still strong, excessive bureaucracy and teachers to reduce the academic freedom of teachers.
7. The existence of confusion in the maslahat additional RPP Teachers in the dock between the provision of insurance education and health services and other welfare work with the performance of teachers. This confusion will impact on the more difficult it is a private teacher and honorary / Non-civil servants to obtain additional maslahat.
To improve the poor working conditions of teachers during the DPP is the FGII convey attitude:
To improve the working conditions of teachers as part of fulfill right to education for everychild in Indonesia :
1. Demand the salary subsidy equivalent UMP / UMK allowances and social security workers (Jamsostek)) for teachers of the private sector and the honorarium / Non-civil servants who are paid by the state / government;
The amount of subsidy UMP Jamsostek, which is required:
The number of non-civil servants, teachers Ministry = 453,257 people
Subsidy amount of Rp = 6,748,887,223,109
The number of non-civil servants, the Ministry of Education Teachers = 922,308 people Subsidy amount of Rp = 9,097,315,946,331. Details:
GTT = 580934 teachers need subsidy of Rp 5,636,318,118,368
GTTPNS = 3254 teachers need subsidy of Rp 31,686,503,991
GTY = 199,036 teachers need Rp 2,027,518,413,769
Bantu Teachers = 77,072 teachers need Rp 777.275.208.645
Honda teachers I = 13,863 teachers need Rp 142,239,018,328
Teachers Honda II = 48,149 teachers need Rp 482.278.683.230
Total non-civil teachers at Depdiknas and DEPAG 1,375,565 teachers need subsidy UMP + jamsostek = Rp 15,846,203,169,440
2. Demand commitment of state (government, local government / kabupaten government / city and the DPR / DPRD) to provide protection to the mandatory teacher;
3. Clearing work contract system for teachers and private-honorerNon civil servants;
4. Demand for the Parliament to conduct revision of discriminatory articles in the Law Teachers and urged the government remove discriminatory articles in the draft regulations before the Teachers passed.
To improve learning conditions for students:
1. Demand the redemption cost of basic education;
2. Government must provide free books given to each of the students;
3. Demand the improvement of school buildings and facilities of learning. Read More..
Discrimination and poor working conditions obtained by a private teacher and honorary / Non-civil servants can be seen from the fact below:
1. Still many teachers are honorarium and the private sector has a salary under the UMP / UMK (Minimum Wages State / district / city);
2. No guarantee of social workers (Jamsostek), which can provide protection, health and safety insurance and old age;
3. There is still a system of contracts and the weak position of teachers in the set or agreements working with the teachers' vulnerable to lay;
4. The existence of discrimination laws Teachers of private teacher and honorary related to salaries, Jamsostek, the functional benefits, improving quality and qualified teachers;
5. The amount of the burden of the working face-to-face per hour (minimum 24-hour face-to-face) that can impact on the low level of the best service for students, the physical and psychological health of teachers working routines since fallen, poor concentration because teachers work more than one school.
(Article 89 and 90 Recommendation Status of Teachers UNESCO-willed ILO to the determination of hours of work teachers should consider the ideal number of students, the time available for teachers to plan and prepare for learning, including adequate time to conduct the assessment, teachers time to participate in the research, I activities and extra-curricular duties of supervision, counseling and guidance to students / students and parents dealing with students / pupils).
6. Still weak protection given to the teachers as mandated by Law Teachers Article 39 is still strong, excessive bureaucracy and teachers to reduce the academic freedom of teachers.
7. The existence of confusion in the maslahat additional RPP Teachers in the dock between the provision of insurance education and health services and other welfare work with the performance of teachers. This confusion will impact on the more difficult it is a private teacher and honorary / Non-civil servants to obtain additional maslahat.
To improve the poor working conditions of teachers during the DPP is the FGII convey attitude:
To improve the working conditions of teachers as part of fulfill right to education for everychild in Indonesia :
1. Demand the salary subsidy equivalent UMP / UMK allowances and social security workers (Jamsostek)) for teachers of the private sector and the honorarium / Non-civil servants who are paid by the state / government;
The amount of subsidy UMP Jamsostek, which is required:
The number of non-civil servants, teachers Ministry = 453,257 people
Subsidy amount of Rp = 6,748,887,223,109
The number of non-civil servants, the Ministry of Education Teachers = 922,308 people Subsidy amount of Rp = 9,097,315,946,331. Details:
GTT = 580934 teachers need subsidy of Rp 5,636,318,118,368
GTTPNS = 3254 teachers need subsidy of Rp 31,686,503,991
GTY = 199,036 teachers need Rp 2,027,518,413,769
Bantu Teachers = 77,072 teachers need Rp 777.275.208.645
Honda teachers I = 13,863 teachers need Rp 142,239,018,328
Teachers Honda II = 48,149 teachers need Rp 482.278.683.230
Total non-civil teachers at Depdiknas and DEPAG 1,375,565 teachers need subsidy UMP + jamsostek = Rp 15,846,203,169,440
2. Demand commitment of state (government, local government / kabupaten government / city and the DPR / DPRD) to provide protection to the mandatory teacher;
3. Clearing work contract system for teachers and private-honorerNon civil servants;
4. Demand for the Parliament to conduct revision of discriminatory articles in the Law Teachers and urged the government remove discriminatory articles in the draft regulations before the Teachers passed.
To improve learning conditions for students:
1. Demand the redemption cost of basic education;
2. Government must provide free books given to each of the students;
3. Demand the improvement of school buildings and facilities of learning. Read More..
Label: foto, video
Teacher Right Advocacy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)